Tuesday, July 1, 2008

Yard Sale Nation

***** PERSONAL NOTE: I hate copy/paste of someone else's blog entry, but I have a hard time disagreeing with this recent entry from Jim on the Clusterfuck Nation blog:


--
This isn't so funny anymore. Intimations of a July banking collapse rumbled though the Internet this weekend while mainstream news orgs like The New York Times and CNN pulled their puds over swift boats and Amy Winehouse's performance technique. Something is happening, and you don't know what it is, do you Mr. Jones...? to quote the master.

What's happening is that American society is sliding into a greater depression than the one Grandma lived through. On the technical side, there has been unending controversy as to whether we're gripped by inflation or deflation. It's certainly deceptive. Food and gasoline prices are rising faster than the rivers of Iowa. But the prices of assets, like houses, stocks, jet-skis, GMC Yukons and pre-owned Hummel figurines are cratering as America turns into Yard Sale Nation.

We're a very different country than we were in 1932. In that earlier crisis of capital, few people had any money but our society still possessed fantastic resources. We had plenty of everything that our land could provide: a treasure trove of mineral ores and the equipment to refine it all, a wealth of oil and gas still in the ground, and all the rigs needed to get at it, manpower galore (and of a highly disciplined, regimented kind), with fine-tuned factories waiting for orders. We had a railroad system that was the envy of the world and millions of family farms (even despite the dust bowl) owned by people who retained age-old skills not yet degraded by agribusiness. We had fully-functional cities with operating waterfronts and ten thousand small towns with local economies, local newspapers, and local culture.

We had a crisis of capital in the 1930s for reasons that are still debated today. My own guess is a combination of a bad debt workout that sucked "money" into a black hole (since money is loaned into existence, but vanishes if the loans are not systematically paid back) plus a gross saturation of markets, meaning that every American who had wanted to buy a car or an electric toaster had done so and there was no one left to sell to. (The first round of globalism -- 1870 - 1914 -- had shut down after the fiasco of World War One.)

Our debt problems today are of a magnitude so extreme that astronomers would be hard pressed to calculate them. By any rational measure our society is comprehensively bankrupt. From the federal treasury down to the suburban cul-de-sacs so much loaned money is either not being paid back, or is at risk of never being paid back, that the suckage of presumed wealth has passed through an event horizon out of the known universe into some other realm of space-time, never to be seen again in this realm. This would seem to be the very essence of monetary deflation -- money defaulted out-of-existence.

This condition is partly disguised by both the loss of credibility of US currency and real-world scarcities of oil and food, but the upshot will be something at least twice as bad as the Great Depression of the 1930s: people with no money in a land with no resources (with manpower that has no discipline), hardly any family farms left, cities that are basket-cases of bottomless need, comatose small towns stripped of their assets and social capital, an aviation industry on the verge of death, and a railroad system that is the laughingstock of the world. Not to mention the mind-boggling liabilities of suburbia and the motoring infrastructure that services it.

The banks have been doing their death dance for an entire year now, pretending that their problems are those of mere "liquidity" (i.e. cash-on-hand) rather than insolvency (no cash either on hand or in the vault and nothing else to sell to raise cash except worthless "creative" securities that nobody would ever buy). But the destruction of money (resulting from loans not paid back) is now so intense that the game of pretend has reached its terminal point. The question for the moment is exactly who and what will be crushed as these institutions roll over and die.

Complicating matters is a global oil predicament that is really not hard to understand, but which the organs of news and opinion have obdurately failed to explicate for an anxious public. Call it Peak Oil. There are only a few elements of it you need to know. 1.) that demand has now permanently outstripped supply; 2.) that new discoveries are too meager to offset consumption; 3.) That under under the circumstances, the systems we rely on for daily life are crumbling. I've called this situation The Long Emergency.

Our chances of mitigating this, and of continuing our current way-of-life is about zero. I've tried to promote the idea that rather than waste remaining resources in the futile attempt to sustain the unsustainable (i.e. come up with "solutions" to keep suburbia running), that we should begin immediately making other arrangements for daily life -- mainly by downscaling and re-scaling everything from farming to commerce to the way we inhabit the landscape -- but my suggestions have proven unpopular even among the "environmental" elites, who are too busy being entranced by new-and-groovy ways to keep all the cars running.

So where we are at now is the equivalent of standing in the slop by the ocean shore under a gathering hundred-foot-high wave that is about to come crashing down on our heads. Since I sure don't know everything, I can't say how this will all play out in the months ahead, especially with the presidential election coming at the exact moment that voters will be turning on their furnaces for the cold and dark winter beyond. I would venture to say that so far our society as a whole has done a piss-poor job of comprehending the situation. But there is still the possibility, with four months of politicking left, that the nature of our predicament can be articulated in a way that few can fail to understand, the way Mr, Lincoln articulated the terms of the Civil War on the eve of its fateful outbreak.

2 comments:

yotmv said...

The entire post is about a decline in the global economy, which I won't refute as it is mostly true. However the idea of peak-oil is a joke. Look at, for instance, Q108 reports.
Total Demand: 86.6
Total Supply: 87.0
Thats millions of barrels per day.
Now most middle eastern countries (using P90 reserve estimates) can pump for roughly 100 years using a somewhat conservative growth estimate on demand. Canada (again, using P90) can pump for 200 years--seeing as how we import mainly from Canada, I'd say that's important.

Now Peak Oil is defined as "maximum rate of global petroleum extraction is reached, after which the rate of production enters terminal decline." --Wikipedia

Supply outstripped demand by all reported numbers for the first quarter. The second quarter numbers will be released in 8 days. All estimates have the supply a bit higher and the demand a bit lower. Considering there is another 100 years of oil in the ground, I don't see the rate of extraction declining, especially not terminally.

Now, consider what might be possible to change in the next 100 years. 1908, what was the world like. Today, what's it like?
Ray Kurzweil, very big "futurist" and many others have been saying that over the next 100 years, we'll have 36 times more change then we have seen over the past 100 years because of acceleration of technology and adaptation. Not considering some of that might go into engines/fuel/etc is gross incompetence.

Also, as for the US decline. Money and credit is all numbers now. The way to keep an economy afloat now is through power. The US Military still has that, put more into the armed forces and less into cutting their legs out and you won't have too many problems with everyday consumer goods. It's like the bully in the kindergarten class--no one wants to stand up to him until, say, high school. Globally, we're just now entering first grade--long way to go before we reach high school and find any considerable challenge.


Oh, and on another note; I'm not worried about oil, i'm more worried about some other precious resources (Zinc, Gallium, Hafnium) are all considered to be endangered and expected to be 100% "gone" in 10 years.

San Antonio Lament said...

Hi, and thanks for the reply!

So I take it you don't believe the world has a "chocolatey nougat oil center" like some abiotic oil enthusiasts believe?

Honestly though, having lived through the echo of the first oil crisis (late 1970s, not the early 1970's OPEC crisis) I can sense that enough has changed in the way of American ATTITUDE that we will not be well-prepared for what is coming.

This is where I tend to side with Jim. While I know that it is fatalistic, I can counter that American Attitude has shifted in a short 30 years from "How Can I" to "How Will It".

Like others in this circle, I also read the Oil Drum and associated pundits, but Jim tends to cut to the bone with his opinion. Peak Oil Theory notwithstanding, you have to admit there is a large percentage of the population undergoing violent delerium tremens in reaction to the price of "everything" going up.

As an optimist, I hope this is as short-lived as it was in the 70's, but I've already liquidated my brokerage accounts as a failsafe...